Evidence does not speak for itself – “Best evidence” needs to be integrated and mobilized at the right time, to the right people! Connecting evidence helps to raise awareness, enrich perspectives and prompt meaningful use of evidence to align Ayurvedic research, policy and practices. Integration of traditional knowledge with empirical and modern evidence can enrich Ayurveda and drive innovation.
“A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence”
Information achieves the status of evidence by comparing with relevant standards
Read More
Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis. GOAL present
Read More
Identifying evidence gaps is crucial to implementing the best evidence
Read More
Ayurveda, with its dynamic process of knowledge building, is designed
Read More
Evidence generated from RCTs (randomized controlled trials) – the gold Read More
Stay current with the latest research, evidence, treatments, practices, and regulations
Read More
Information achieves the status of evidence by comparing with relevant standards, along with systematic analysis and reasoning to justify claims, thereby providing a framework for the data-information-evidence-knowledge transition. Pramana Vidnyana exemplifies Ayurvedic scientific methodology based on deep observation, systematic comparison, logical reasoning of scriptures, experiments, and experience to generate valid evidence, that was applied in clinical practice.
Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis. GOAL presents a unique evidence collection that ranges from historical evidence in classical texts to primary, secondary, and tertiary evidence from modern research. Integrating multiple forms of evidence create synergies across diverse knowledge systems to generate actionable insights that can inform practice, policy, manufacturing, and individual decision-making.
Identifying evidence gaps is crucial to implementing the best evidence and facilitating knowledge transfer. The frequency of ‘contradictory’ and ‘inconclusive’ evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analysis that uses top-rated placebo-controlled trials on a randomized population as proof of efficacy, warrants the need for pragmatic and whole system models to fill the evidence gap in Ayurveda.
Identifying evidence gaps is crucial to implementing the best evidence and facilitating knowledge transfer. The frequency of ‘contradictory’ and ‘inconclusive’ evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analysis that uses top-rated placebo-controlled trials on a randomized population as proof of efficacy, warrants the need for pragmatic and whole system models to fill the evidence gap in Ayurveda.
Evidence generated from RCTs (randomized controlled trials) – the gold standard of clinical research with a ‘one-size-fits-all’ rationale appears to be a weak model in the era of precision medicine. Ongoing data-driven strategies that integrate real-world data (RWD) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to generate real-world evidence (RWE) offers a pragmatic option for personalized multimodal therapies common in Ayurvedic practice
Stay current with the latest research, evidence, treatments, practices, and regulations using the best online evidence-based databases relevant to Ayurveda and traditional medicine. Evidence databases are designed to systematize the search and present high-quality reliable evidence for transforming research into practice.
An initiative by Santhigram Foundation | Copyright©2022-23 | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
An initiative by Santhigram Foundation | Copyright©2022-23
